Thursday, May 15, 2008

Web Links Posted in Comments

Unfortunately when posting web links or email addresses in the Comment box, you have to include the html tags for the links to be functional. If you have posting privileges, and post an original post, then that is not an issue. Anyone can request posting privileges.

Thanks Relic, for the info on the Wega insider selling permission from BCSC. The link there is:

http://www.bcsc.bc.ca/comdoc.nsf/comdoc.nsf/webpolicies/7BC7D98FCAFEA2BB88257424007F25CC?OpenDocument

That would suggest that there is nothing to fear from Wega when the MCTO is lifted and lends credence to the theory that they might have been assured of changes for them to cease selling on April 16.

The email addresses posted by Cal Powers are:

Margaret Kent: mkent@centurymining.com

William (Bill) Sheridan, Corp Secretary: wsheridan@langmichener.ca

I noticed from today's trades that not a single share was sold at the bid. I've never seen that before.

10 comments:

nino said...

Hans-Arne Lorange hal@wegamining.com

Sverre Slattsveen sverre@wegamining.com

Anonymous said...

Who has been selling the one hundred plua blocks over the past week or so? Could it be Wega?

nino said...

One more,

Michel Del Buono, Ph.D.

Scion Capital

mdelbuono@scioncapital.com

Its time to move on, one way or another.

nino said...

What going on with the year-end 2007 financial statements, maybe it will include some good news?

Thats one big dream!!!

I hope you guys aren't sitting on your hands, email some of the people with your concerns.

Anonymous said...

Nino, watch for out-of-control buses when you're in crosswalks. I heard that PK is hunting down disident shareholders.

The year-ends might come next week, perhaps news about the PP too.

I have a legal opinion with respect to a class-action suit.

The AGM should be heated. I'm not leaving without someone's resignation.

Anonymous said...

Natik - the only thing that is will be "resigned" at the end of of the AGM is shareholders. Shareholders will either be resigned to a low share price while PK is on board, or they are going to resign as shareholders.

PK isn't going anywhere and nothing significant is going to change at the AGM....

nino said...

Anonymous

I guess we will have to wait and see. I'll be waiting, not selling
at this price.

Natik, PK probably knows my name by now, maybe thats why the AGM got moved to Vancouver from Toronto. Just kidding.

Anonymous said...

Could be that the cat PK has some lives left:

Heads up from Jim Sinclair
Posted On: Friday, May 16, 2008, 10:48:00 PM EST

Dear CIGAs,
50 years of trading markets and building companies combined with outrageous good fortune has given me a reliable sense of timing and value.
I suggest that you cancel all sell orders at any price in precious metals immediately so that no orders exist when Asia opens.
Sometimes Bert and Jesse trusted their years of experience to guide them free of any tools at major points of change.
The hairs on the back of my neck are standing up at attention. Not a pretty sight.
That is what happened at $400 in the 70s and $600 recently.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the headsup, baystock. PK has more than 9 lives I think.

No personal information is revealed by an ISP address. That is given out only by the ISP provider who would have to be approached by law-enforcement or a lawyer with a lawsuit that he or she is about to file in the courts.

The ISP gives out a local location of the provider's server that you use. They'll know your city but that's all.

So when a certain multi-alias guy goes at that other place saying that someone here has the name and address of all who post here, that's just one more bit of hogwash among the oodles he's known for.

Anonymous said...

CMM shareholder folks,
As we move forward with our shareholder rebellion & trying to decide what actions we should take, it may be worth recapping our individual & collective reasons why we think PK should resign as CEO of OUR company.
I'll start with my reasons:
1. Failing to keep promises (e.g. over-promising; under-delivering),
2. High turnover of CFOs,
3. High turnover of key mining personnel (I am not 100% sure about this one; could someone e.g. Carib, Production? verify, please)
4. Failing to set appropriate corporate priorities (e.g. ramp up Lamaque & SJ production first, develop steady cashflow, & then go after other assets).
5. Regulatory mess.
6. Failing to learn from her mistakes
7...?
8...?
Most of you are probably better informed about other issues/failings.
I look forward to reading your responses.